Cape Verde vs Gambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Cape Verde
2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
1.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
55th
Gambia rank
57th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Gambia
01.0M2.0M3.0M196719952023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 475,120 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.3 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Gambia ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 55th and Gambia ranks 57th of 194 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and Gambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Gambia Difference Ahead
1980s 503,923 constant LCU per square kilometre 826,375 constant LCU per square kilometre 322,452 constant LCU per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 865,094 constant LCU per square kilometre 834,744 constant LCU per square kilometre 30,351 constant LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde
2000s 1.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 490,001 constant LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 2.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 2.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre 822,860 constant LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Cape Verde or Gambia?
Cape Verde, at 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Cape Verde and Gambia?
475,120 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Gambia?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Gambia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Cape Verde ranks 55th and Gambia ranks 57th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Gambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/gambia-the/">Cape Verde vs Gambia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.