Botswana vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Botswana
5,746 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
6,258 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
186th
Suriname rank
185th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 6,258 constant LCU per square kilometre against 5,746 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 512 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 186th and Suriname ranks 185th of 194 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 3,578 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,960 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,383 constant LCU per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 3,042 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,125 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,083 constant LCU per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 4,123 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,151 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,028 constant LCU per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 4,249 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,757 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,507 constant LCU per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 5,416 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,378 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,962 constant LCU per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 5,651 constant LCU per square kilometre 6,549 constant LCU per square kilometre 897.45 constant LCU per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Botswana or Suriname?
Suriname, at 6,258 constant LCU per square kilometre against 5,746 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Botswana and Suriname?
512 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Botswana ranks 186th and Suriname ranks 185th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.