Bolivia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Bolivia
28,057 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
26,679 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
158th
Panama rank
159th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Bolivia
  • Panama
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 28,057 constant LCU per square kilometre against 26,679 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 1,378 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Panama ahead.

Bolivia ranks 158th and Panama ranks 159th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Panama Difference Ahead
1970s 7,183 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,486 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,303 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
1980s 8,584 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,070 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,486 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
1990s 11,169 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,431 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,261 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
2000s 14,755 constant LCU per square kilometre 19,200 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,445 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
2010s 19,985 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,315 constant LCU per square kilometre 329.63 constant LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 26,298 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,424 constant LCU per square kilometre 873.83 constant LCU per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Bolivia or Panama?
Bolivia, at 28,057 constant LCU per square kilometre against 26,679 constant LCU per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Bolivia and Panama?
1,378 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Panama?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Panama rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Bolivia ranks 158th and Panama ranks 159th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/panama/">Bolivia vs Panama: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.