Belgium vs Switzerland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Belgium
112,793 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Switzerland
131,169 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
116th
Switzerland rank
114th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Belgium
  • Switzerland
050.0k100.0k150.0k199020062023

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 131,169 constant LCU per square kilometre against 112,793 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 18,376 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Switzerland ahead.

Belgium ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 114th of 194 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 87,326 constant LCU per square kilometre 119,931 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,605 constant LCU per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 110,298 constant LCU per square kilometre 127,348 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,050 constant LCU per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 108,163 constant LCU per square kilometre 126,057 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,894 constant LCU per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Belgium or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 131,169 constant LCU per square kilometre against 112,793 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Belgium and Switzerland?
18,376 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Switzerland?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Switzerland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Belgium ranks 116th and Switzerland ranks 114th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Switzerland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belgium/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belgium/switzerland/">Belgium vs Switzerland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.