Belarus vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Belarus
76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
128th
New Zealand rank
129th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Belarus
  • New Zealand
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197720002023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre against 72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 3,826 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 128th and New Zealand ranks 129th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 42,025 constant LCU per square kilometre 49,327 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,302 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 49,640 constant LCU per square kilometre 58,080 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,440 constant LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 70,408 constant LCU per square kilometre 65,272 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,136 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 76,564 constant LCU per square kilometre 71,172 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,393 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Belarus or New Zealand?
Belarus, at 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre against 72,924 constant LCU per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Belarus and New Zealand?
3,826 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Zealand?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Belarus ranks 128th and New Zealand ranks 129th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/new-zealand/">Belarus vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.