How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malta?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Malta: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Belarus

76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Malta

78,438 constant LCU per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

128th

Malta rank

126th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

Belarus
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 78,438 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 1,688 constant LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 128th and Malta ranks 126th of 194 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Malta	Difference	Ahead
2000s	49,640 constant LCU per square kilometre	563,341 constant LCU per square kilometre	513,702 constant LCU per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	70,408 constant LCU per square kilometre	449,037 constant LCU per square kilometre	378,629 constant LCU per square kilometre	Malta
2020s	76,564 constant LCU per square kilometre	331,511 constant LCU per square kilometre	254,947 constant LCU per square kilometre	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Belarus or Malta?: Malta, at 78,438 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Belarus and Malta?: 1,688 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malta?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Malta rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?: Belarus ranks 128th and Malta ranks 126th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Malta: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/malta/">Belarus vs Malta: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit: constant LCU per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 September 2026

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.