Belarus vs Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Belarus
76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland
69,943 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
128th
Ireland rank
131st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Ireland
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre against 69,943 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 6,807 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 128th and Ireland ranks 131st of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 39,148 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,436 constant LCU per square kilometre 288 constant LCU per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 49,640 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,315 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,325 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 70,408 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,149 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,259 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 76,564 constant LCU per square kilometre 61,871 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,693 constant LCU per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Belarus or Ireland?
Belarus, at 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre against 69,943 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Belarus and Ireland?
6,807 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ireland?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Ireland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Belarus ranks 128th and Ireland ranks 131st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/ireland/">Belarus vs Ireland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.