Belarus vs Germany: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Belarus
76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
77,354 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
128th
Germany rank
127th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Belarus
  • Germany
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199120072023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 77,354 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 604 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Germany ahead.

Belarus ranks 128th and Germany ranks 127th of 194 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Germany Difference Ahead
1990s 42,025 constant LCU per square kilometre 73,702 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,678 constant LCU per square kilometre Germany
2000s 49,640 constant LCU per square kilometre 73,624 constant LCU per square kilometre 23,984 constant LCU per square kilometre Germany
2010s 70,408 constant LCU per square kilometre 73,033 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,625 constant LCU per square kilometre Germany
2020s 76,564 constant LCU per square kilometre 80,560 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,995 constant LCU per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Belarus or Germany?
Germany, at 77,354 constant LCU per square kilometre against 76,750 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Belarus and Germany?
604 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Germany?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Germany rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Belarus ranks 128th and Germany ranks 127th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Germany: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/germany/">Belarus vs Germany: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.