Austria vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Austria
51,405 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
46,051 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
141st
Lesotho rank
144th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Austria
  • Lesotho
020.0k40.0k60.0k197019962023

How they compare

Austria currently reports 51,405 constant LCU per square kilometre against 46,051 constant LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 5,354 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 141st and Lesotho ranks 144th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 5 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Lesotho Difference Ahead
1970s 38,220 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,359 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,140 constant LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 37,835 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,536 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,299 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
1990s 41,383 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,896 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,487 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
2000s 46,163 constant LCU per square kilometre 31,753 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,410 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
2010s 49,927 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,385 constant LCU per square kilometre 15,542 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria
2020s 51,773 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,021 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,752 constant LCU per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Austria or Lesotho?
Austria, at 51,405 constant LCU per square kilometre against 46,051 constant LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Austria and Lesotho?
5,354 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Lesotho?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Austria and Lesotho rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Austria ranks 141st and Lesotho ranks 144th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/lesotho/">Austria vs Lesotho: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.