Australia vs Eritrea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Australia
7,389 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea
7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2009
Australia rank
183rd
Eritrea rank
182nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Australia
  • Eritrea
05.0k10.0k15.0k197519992023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre against 7,389 constant LCU per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 502 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 183rd and Eritrea ranks 182nd of 194 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 3,824 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,015 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,192 constant LCU per square kilometre Eritrea
2000s 5,057 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,021 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,964 constant LCU per square kilometre Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Australia or Eritrea?
Eritrea, at 7,891 constant LCU per square kilometre against 7,389 constant LCU per square kilometre in Australia as of 2009.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Australia and Eritrea?
502 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eritrea?
17 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2009.
How do Australia and Eritrea rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Australia ranks 183rd and Eritrea ranks 182nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Eritrea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/eritrea/">Australia vs Eritrea: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.