Aruba vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Aruba
11,372 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
13,279 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
178th
Namibia rank
176th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Aruba
  • Namibia
5.0k10.0k15.0k198020012023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 13,279 constant LCU per square kilometre against 11,372 constant LCU per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 1,907 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 178th and Namibia ranks 176th of 194 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 5,161 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,491 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,330 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 7,782 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,440 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,658 constant LCU per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Aruba or Namibia?
Namibia, at 13,279 constant LCU per square kilometre against 11,372 constant LCU per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Aruba and Namibia?
1,907 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Namibia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Namibia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Aruba ranks 178th and Namibia ranks 176th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/namibia/">Aruba vs Namibia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.