Angola vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Angola
2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
1.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
56th
Iceland rank
58th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Angola
  • Iceland
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199520092023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 578,520 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.4 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.

Angola ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 58th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Iceland Difference Ahead
2000s 937,744 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 307,274 constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 1.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 388,224 constant LCU per square kilometre Angola
2020s 2.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre 522,252 constant LCU per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Angola or Iceland?
Angola, at 2.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Angola and Iceland?
578,520 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Iceland?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Angola and Iceland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Angola ranks 56th and Iceland ranks 58th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/angola/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/angola/iceland/">Angola vs Iceland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.