Panama vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Panama
459.5 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
472.15 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Panama rank
154th
Zimbabwe rank
152nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
2004006008001.0k196919972025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 472.15 constant LCU per person against 459.5 constant LCU per person in Panama, a difference of 12.65 constant LCU per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Panama ranks 154th and Zimbabwe ranks 152nd of 197 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 368.98 constant LCU per person 775.61 constant LCU per person 406.63 constant LCU per person Zimbabwe
1980s 377.61 constant LCU per person 628.2 constant LCU per person 250.59 constant LCU per person Zimbabwe
1990s 369.84 constant LCU per person 650.4 constant LCU per person 280.56 constant LCU per person Zimbabwe
2000s 434.2 constant LCU per person 509.07 constant LCU per person 74.87 constant LCU per person Zimbabwe
2010s 383.16 constant LCU per person 330.2 constant LCU per person 52.96 constant LCU per person Panama
2020s 442.76 constant LCU per person 432.87 constant LCU per person 9.9 constant LCU per person Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 472.15 constant LCU per person against 459.5 constant LCU per person in Panama as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Panama and Zimbabwe?
12.65 constant LCU per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Panama ranks 154th and Zimbabwe ranks 152nd of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.