Pakistan vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Pakistan
37,987 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Uruguay
38,440 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Pakistan rank
52nd
Uruguay rank
51st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Pakistan
  • Uruguay
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196019922025

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 38,440 constant LCU per person against 37,987 constant LCU per person in Pakistan, a difference of 453 constant LCU per person.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 51st of 197 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Uruguay Difference Ahead
1980s 26,941 constant LCU per person 21,088 constant LCU per person 5,852 constant LCU per person Pakistan
1990s 29,871 constant LCU per person 25,295 constant LCU per person 4,575 constant LCU per person Pakistan
2000s 32,222 constant LCU per person 28,763 constant LCU per person 3,459 constant LCU per person Pakistan
2010s 33,151 constant LCU per person 33,015 constant LCU per person 135.89 constant LCU per person Pakistan
2020s 36,347 constant LCU per person 34,197 constant LCU per person 2,150 constant LCU per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Pakistan or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 38,440 constant LCU per person against 37,987 constant LCU per person in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Pakistan and Uruguay?
453 constant LCU per person, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Uruguay?
43 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2025.
How do Pakistan and Uruguay rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Pakistan ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 51st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/pakistan/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/pakistan/uruguay/">Pakistan vs Uruguay: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.