New Zealand vs Sweden: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

New Zealand
3,800 constant LCU per person
in 2024
Sweden
5,109 constant LCU per person
in 2025
New Zealand rank
88th
Sweden rank
85th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sweden
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k197720012025

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 5,109 constant LCU per person against 3,800 constant LCU per person in New Zealand, a difference of 1,309 constant LCU per person.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times New Zealand's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 88th and Sweden ranks 85th of 197 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sweden Difference Ahead
1980s 2,903 constant LCU per person 5,300 constant LCU per person 2,397 constant LCU per person Sweden
1990s 3,498 constant LCU per person 5,160 constant LCU per person 1,662 constant LCU per person Sweden
2000s 3,741 constant LCU per person 5,417 constant LCU per person 1,676 constant LCU per person Sweden
2010s 3,727 constant LCU per person 5,883 constant LCU per person 2,156 constant LCU per person Sweden
2020s 3,694 constant LCU per person 5,764 constant LCU per person 2,070 constant LCU per person Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, New Zealand or Sweden?
Sweden, at 5,109 constant LCU per person against 3,800 constant LCU per person in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between New Zealand and Sweden?
1,309 constant LCU per person, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
New Zealand ranks 88th and Sweden ranks 85th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sweden: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/new-zealand/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/new-zealand/sweden/">New Zealand vs Sweden: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.