Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Kyrgyzstan
10,423 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Norway
10,592 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
71st
Norway rank
70th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Norway
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019972025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 10,592 constant LCU per person against 10,423 constant LCU per person in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 169 constant LCU per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 71st and Norway ranks 70th of 197 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Norway Difference Ahead
1980s 8,996 constant LCU per person 6,650 constant LCU per person 2,346 constant LCU per person Kyrgyzstan
1990s 7,991 constant LCU per person 8,357 constant LCU per person 366.41 constant LCU per person Norway
2000s 9,902 constant LCU per person 9,226 constant LCU per person 676.38 constant LCU per person Kyrgyzstan
2010s 10,117 constant LCU per person 11,210 constant LCU per person 1,093 constant LCU per person Norway
2020s 10,081 constant LCU per person 11,121 constant LCU per person 1,040 constant LCU per person Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Kyrgyzstan or Norway?
Norway, at 10,592 constant LCU per person against 10,423 constant LCU per person in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
169 constant LCU per person, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Norway?
39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Norway rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 71st and Norway ranks 70th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/kyrgyz-republic/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/kyrgyz-republic/norway/">Kyrgyzstan vs Norway: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.