Guinea vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Guinea
1.26 million constant LCU per person
in 2025
Lao People's Democratic Republic
2.71 million constant LCU per person
in 2025
Guinea rank
6th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
5th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Guinea
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M198620052025

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 2.71 million constant LCU per person against 1.26 million constant LCU per person in Guinea, a difference of 1.45 million constant LCU per person.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 2.2 times Guinea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 6th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 5th of 197 countries.

Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 599,854 constant LCU per person 2.08 million constant LCU per person 1.48 million constant LCU per person Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s 795,695 constant LCU per person 2.42 million constant LCU per person 1.63 million constant LCU per person Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 1.15 million constant LCU per person 2.61 million constant LCU per person 1.46 million constant LCU per person Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Guinea or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 2.71 million constant LCU per person against 1.26 million constant LCU per person in Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Guinea and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
1.45 million constant LCU per person, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Guinea and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Guinea ranks 6th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 5th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/guinea/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/guinea/lao-pdr/">Guinea vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.