Ecuador vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Ecuador
559.86 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Latvia
542.54 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Ecuador rank
144th
Latvia rank
146th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
200300400500600196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 559.86 constant LCU per person against 542.54 constant LCU per person in Latvia, a difference of 17.32 constant LCU per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 146th of 197 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 295.79 constant LCU per person 262.17 constant LCU per person 33.62 constant LCU per person Ecuador
2000s 337.42 constant LCU per person 368.92 constant LCU per person 31.51 constant LCU per person Latvia
2010s 438.27 constant LCU per person 505.17 constant LCU per person 66.9 constant LCU per person Latvia
2020s 517.56 constant LCU per person 573.24 constant LCU per person 55.68 constant LCU per person Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Ecuador or Latvia?
Ecuador, at 559.86 constant LCU per person against 542.54 constant LCU per person in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Ecuador and Latvia?
17.32 constant LCU per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Ecuador ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 146th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.