Brazil vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Brazil
1,255 constant LCU per person
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
1,185 constant LCU per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
115th
United Arab Emirates rank
117th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Brazil
  • United Arab Emirates
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196019922025

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 1,255 constant LCU per person against 1,185 constant LCU per person in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 70 constant LCU per person.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times United Arab Emirates's.

Across all 50 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 115th and United Arab Emirates ranks 117th of 197 countries.

United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 463.87 constant LCU per person 1,099 constant LCU per person 635.19 constant LCU per person United Arab Emirates
1980s 528.82 constant LCU per person 1,476 constant LCU per person 946.92 constant LCU per person United Arab Emirates
1990s 556.78 constant LCU per person 2,506 constant LCU per person 1,949 constant LCU per person United Arab Emirates
2000s 729.02 constant LCU per person 2,524 constant LCU per person 1,795 constant LCU per person United Arab Emirates
2010s 913.87 constant LCU per person 1,138 constant LCU per person 223.82 constant LCU per person United Arab Emirates
2020s 1,077 constant LCU per person 1,243 constant LCU per person 166.13 constant LCU per person United Arab Emirates

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Brazil or United Arab Emirates?
Brazil, at 1,255 constant LCU per person against 1,185 constant LCU per person in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Brazil and United Arab Emirates?
70 constant LCU per person, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and United Arab Emirates?
50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
How do Brazil and United Arab Emirates rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Brazil ranks 115th and United Arab Emirates ranks 117th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/brazil/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-capita/brazil/united-arab-emirates/">Brazil vs United Arab Emirates: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 8,503 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.