Turks and Caicos Islands vs United Kingdom: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0046 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
United Kingdom
0.005 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
180th
United Kingdom rank
177th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • United Kingdom
00.0030.0050.0070.01199020072025

How they compare

United Kingdom currently reports 0.005 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0046 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th and United Kingdom ranks 177th of 194 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0085 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0026 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0048 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0062 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0014 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP United Kingdom
2020s 0.0051 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.006 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Turks and Caicos Islands or United Kingdom?
United Kingdom, at 0.005 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0046 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Turks and Caicos Islands and United Kingdom?
0.0004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with United Kingdom ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and United Kingdom?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and United Kingdom rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 180th and United Kingdom ranks 177th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs United Kingdom: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/turks-and-caicos-islands/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/turks-and-caicos-islands/united-kingdom/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs United Kingdom: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.