Switzerland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Switzerland
0.0046 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0047 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Switzerland rank
179th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
178th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Switzerland
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.020.040.06198420042025

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0047 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0046 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Switzerland, a difference of 0.0001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Switzerland ranks 179th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 178th of 194 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Switzerland Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0151 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0534 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0383 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0109 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0218 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0108 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0064 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0083 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0052 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.006 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0007 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Switzerland or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0047 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0046 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Switzerland as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Switzerland and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Switzerland and Trinidad and Tobago?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Switzerland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Switzerland ranks 179th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 178th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Switzerland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/switzerland/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/switzerland/trinidad-and-tobago/">Switzerland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.