Peru vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Peru
0.0549 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0.0545 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Peru rank
86th
Zimbabwe rank
87th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Peru
  • Zimbabwe
00.250.50.7511.2196019922025

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.0549 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0545 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Peru ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6173 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7914 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1741 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1970s 0.3623 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4804 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1181 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1980s 0.2455 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2645 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.019 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1990s 0.1428 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3375 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1947 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1301 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3598 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2297 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.069 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0775 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0084 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0663 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0613 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.005 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Peru or Zimbabwe?
Peru, at 0.0549 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0545 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Peru and Zimbabwe?
0.0004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Zimbabwe?
57 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2025.
How do Peru and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Peru ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 87th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/peru/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/peru/zimbabwe/">Peru vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.