Panama vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Panama
0.0251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Africa
0.0247 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Panama rank
126th
South Africa rank
127th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Panama
  • South Africa
00.10.20.30.40.5196019922025

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0247 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in South Africa, a difference of 0.0004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 126th and South Africa ranks 127th of 194 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3149 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0977 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2172 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Panama
1980s 0.1494 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0491 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1003 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Panama
1990s 0.1206 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0325 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0881 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Panama
2000s 0.0934 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0267 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0666 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Panama
2010s 0.0327 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0197 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.013 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Panama
2020s 0.028 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0252 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0028 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Panama or South Africa?
Panama, at 0.0251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0247 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Panama and South Africa?
0.0004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and South Africa?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Panama and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Panama ranks 126th and South Africa ranks 127th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/panama/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/panama/south-africa/">Panama vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.