Pakistan vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Pakistan
0.2282 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sudan
0.2169 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pakistan rank
16th
Sudan rank
17th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Sudan
01234196019922025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.2282 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2169 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0.0113 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sudan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 17th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Sudan Difference Ahead
1960s 1.86 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.98 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan
1970s 1.59 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.59 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0027 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan
1980s 0.7932 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7128 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0803 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1990s 0.6983 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9261 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2278 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan
2000s 0.3985 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5832 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1847 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan
2010s 0.2465 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3815 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.135 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan
2020s 0.241 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3615 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1204 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Pakistan or Sudan?
Pakistan, at 0.2282 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2169 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Pakistan and Sudan?
0.0113 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sudan?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Pakistan and Sudan rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Pakistan ranks 16th and Sudan ranks 17th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pakistan/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pakistan/sudan/">Pakistan vs Sudan: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.