Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Nepal
0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Nepal rank
23rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
20th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Nepal
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.511.522.5196519952025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0.0154 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6886 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1191 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2000s 0.5897 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4533 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1364 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2010s 0.263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2694 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0064 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.2012 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2221 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0209 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Nepal or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0154 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Nepal ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/tanzania/">Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.