Nepal vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Nepal
0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Nepal rank
23rd
Rwanda rank
26th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Nepal
  • Rwanda
00.511.522.5196519952025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0109 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 26th of 194 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2.27 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.84 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4245 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1970s 1.68 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9997 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6814 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1980s 0.9263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3896 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5368 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1990s 0.8077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3834 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4243 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2000s 0.5897 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4274 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1623 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2010s 0.263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.234 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0289 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2020s 0.2012 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1962 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.005 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Nepal or Rwanda?
Nepal, at 0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Nepal and Rwanda?
0.0109 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Rwanda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Nepal ranks 23rd and Rwanda ranks 26th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/nepal/rwanda/">Nepal vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.