Mauritius vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Mauritius
0.0356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
New Zealand
0.0339 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mauritius rank
115th
New Zealand rank
116th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Mauritius
  • New Zealand
00.10.20.30.4197620002025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0339 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0017 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 115th and New Zealand ranks 116th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.2929 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1719 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.121 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1980s 0.2002 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1436 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0567 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1990s 0.0806 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1045 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.024 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2000s 0.0485 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0765 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.028 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2010s 0.0289 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0405 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0116 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2020s 0.0347 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0341 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Mauritius or New Zealand?
Mauritius, at 0.0356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0339 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in New Zealand as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Mauritius and New Zealand?
0.0017 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
48 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Mauritius ranks 115th and New Zealand ranks 116th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/mauritius/new-zealand/">Mauritius vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.