Lower middle income vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Lower middle income
0.1573 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mozambique
0.2382 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Lower middle income rank
11th
Mozambique rank
12th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Lower middle income
  • Mozambique
00.511.5196419942025

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.2382 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1573 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.0809 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.5 times Lower middle income's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lower middle income ahead.

Lower middle income ranks 11th and Mozambique ranks 12th of 46 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lower middle income averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lower middle income Mozambique Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4503 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3582 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0922 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
2000s 0.3183 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.279 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0392 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Lower middle income
2010s 0.1729 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2592 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0864 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mozambique
2020s 0.163 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2639 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Lower middle income or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 0.2382 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1573 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Lower middle income and Mozambique?
0.0809 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Mozambique?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Lower middle income and Mozambique rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Lower middle income ranks 11th and Mozambique ranks 12th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lower middle income vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/lower-middle-income/mozambique/">Lower middle income vs Mozambique: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.