Low income vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Low income
0.2221 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sierra Leone
0.432 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Low income rank
3rd
Sierra Leone rank
3rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Low income
  • Sierra Leone
00.511.522.5196419942025

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 0.432 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2221 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Low income, a difference of 0.2099 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.9 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Low income ranks 3rd and Sierra Leone ranks 3rd of 46 groups.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1980s 0.5681 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.29 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sierra Leone
1990s 0.6403 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.65 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sierra Leone
2000s 0.4664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7526 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2862 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sierra Leone
2010s 0.2689 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.384 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.115 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sierra Leone
2020s 0.2437 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4289 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1853 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Low income or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 0.432 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2221 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Low income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Low income and Sierra Leone?
0.2099 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Sierra Leone?
42 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2025.
How do Low income and Sierra Leone rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Low income ranks 3rd and Sierra Leone ranks 3rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-income/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-income/sierra-leone/">Low income vs Sierra Leone: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.