Low & middle income vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Low & middle income
0.0832 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Uganda
0.1914 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Low & middle income rank
20th
Uganda rank
22nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Uganda
00.511.5196019922025

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.1914 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0832 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income, a difference of 0.1082 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Uganda's figure about 2.3 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 46 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 0.3822 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9109 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5287 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
1990s 0.2939 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9904 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6965 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
2000s 0.1987 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7106 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5119 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
2010s 0.0953 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1569 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda
2020s 0.0866 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2199 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1333 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Low & middle income or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.1914 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0832 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Low & middle income and Uganda?
0.1082 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Uganda?
44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
How do Low & middle income and Uganda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Low & middle income ranks 20th and Uganda ranks 22nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/uganda/">Low & middle income vs Uganda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.