Ireland vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Ireland
0.0067 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0076 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Ireland rank
173rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
171st

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Ireland
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.050.10.150.2197720012025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0076 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0067 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Ireland, a difference of 0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 173rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 171st of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0321 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.007 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ireland
2000s 0.0126 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0149 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0024 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0089 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0088 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ireland
2020s 0.0077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0087 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Ireland or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0076 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0067 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Ireland as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Ireland and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Ireland and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Ireland ranks 173rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 171st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ireland/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Ireland vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.