IBRD only vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

IBRD only
0.0688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
IBRD only rank
25th
Rwanda rank
26th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Rwanda
00.511.52196019922025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IBRD only, a difference of 0.1103 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 2.6 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Rwanda ahead.

IBRD only ranks 25th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 46 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.84 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7998 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1970s 0.5747 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9997 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.425 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0.302 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3896 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0876 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0.2478 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3834 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.165 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4274 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2624 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.0789 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.234 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1552 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.0727 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1962 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1234 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), IBRD only or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IBRD only as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between IBRD only and Rwanda?
0.1103 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Rwanda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do IBRD only and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
IBRD only ranks 25th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ibrd-only/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ibrd-only/rwanda/">IBRD only vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.