IBRD only vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

IBRD only
0.0688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Nepal
0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
IBRD only rank
25th
Nepal rank
23rd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Nepal
00.511.522.5196019922025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IBRD only, a difference of 0.1212 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nepal's figure about 2.8 times IBRD only's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 25th and Nepal ranks 23rd of 46 groups.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.27 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.22 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1970s 0.5747 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.68 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.11 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1980s 0.302 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6244 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
1990s 0.2478 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8077 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.56 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2000s 0.165 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5897 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4248 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2010s 0.0789 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1841 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal
2020s 0.0727 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2012 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1285 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), IBRD only or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.19 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IBRD only as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between IBRD only and Nepal?
0.1212 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Nepal?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do IBRD only and Nepal rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
IBRD only ranks 25th and Nepal ranks 23rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ibrd-only/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ibrd-only/nepal/">IBRD only vs Nepal: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.