Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Liberia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.1648 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Liberia
0.2899 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
9th
Liberia rank
8th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Liberia
0.20.40.60.8198820062025

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0.2899 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1648 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.1251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.8 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 9th and Liberia ranks 8th of 46 groups.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Liberia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3918 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5307 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1389 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Liberia
2010s 0.2196 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3911 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1715 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Liberia
2020s 0.1879 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3444 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1565 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Liberia?
Liberia, at 0.2899 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1648 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Liberia?
0.1251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Liberia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Liberia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 9th and Liberia ranks 8th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Liberia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/liberia/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Liberia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.