Guinea-Bissau vs Lower middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Guinea-Bissau
0.2428 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Lower middle income
0.1573 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
11th
Lower middle income rank
11th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lower middle income
00.511.5196419942025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0.2428 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1573 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.0855 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.5 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 11th and Lower middle income ranks 11th of 194 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4192 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3924 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0268 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.5053 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3183 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.187 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.3399 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1729 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.167 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.2714 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.163 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1084 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Guinea-Bissau or Lower middle income?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0.2428 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1573 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Lower middle income as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Guinea-Bissau and Lower middle income?
0.0855 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lower middle income?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Lower middle income rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 11th and Lower middle income ranks 11th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Lower middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea-bissau/lower-middle-income/">Guinea-Bissau vs Lower middle income: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.