Grenada vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Grenada
0.0246 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Africa
0.0247 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Grenada rank
130th
South Africa rank
127th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Grenada
  • South Africa
00.20.40.60.8196019922025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0247 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0246 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Grenada, a difference of 0.0001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 130th and South Africa ranks 127th of 194 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0.5626 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0737 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4889 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada
1980s 0.3109 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0491 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2619 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada
1990s 0.1276 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0325 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0951 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada
2000s 0.06 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0267 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0333 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada
2010s 0.0529 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0197 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0332 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada
2020s 0.0352 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0252 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0101 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Grenada or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.0247 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0246 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Grenada as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Grenada and South Africa?
0.0001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and South Africa?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do Grenada and South Africa rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Grenada ranks 130th and South Africa ranks 127th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/grenada/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/grenada/south-africa/">Grenada vs South Africa: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.