Gambia vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Gambia
0.1778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Rwanda
0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Gambia rank
28th
Rwanda rank
26th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Gambia
  • Rwanda
0123196519952025

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Gambia, a difference of 0.0013 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2.88 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.75 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.14 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Gambia
1970s 1.83 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9997 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8292 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Gambia
1980s 0.9857 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3896 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5962 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Gambia
1990s 0.3223 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3834 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0611 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.3648 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4274 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0626 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.2218 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.234 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0123 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.1837 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1962 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0124 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Gambia or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.1791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1778 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Gambia and Rwanda?
0.0013 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Rwanda?
59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
How do Gambia and Rwanda rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Gambia ranks 28th and Rwanda ranks 26th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/gambia-the/rwanda/">Gambia vs Rwanda: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.