Egypt vs India: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Egypt
0.1444 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
India
0.1344 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Egypt rank
42nd
India rank
45th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Egypt
  • India
00.511.522.5196019922025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.1444 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1344 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in India, a difference of 0.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was India ahead.

Egypt ranks 42nd and India ranks 45th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and India in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt India Difference Ahead
1960s 1.88 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.76 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1105 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Egypt
1970s 1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.18 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1708 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP India
1980s 0.4524 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6064 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.154 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP India
1990s 0.3438 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5595 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2157 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP India
2000s 0.2586 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.339 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0804 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP India
2010s 0.1336 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1635 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.03 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP India
2020s 0.1205 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1453 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0248 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Egypt or India?
Egypt, at 0.1444 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1344 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in India as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Egypt and India?
0.01 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and India?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Egypt and India rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Egypt ranks 42nd and India ranks 45th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs India: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/egypt-arab-rep/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/egypt-arab-rep/india/">Egypt vs India: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.