Ecuador vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Ecuador
0.0823 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tunisia
0.081 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Ecuador rank
63rd
Tunisia rank
65th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tunisia
00.20.40.60.81196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0823 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.081 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0013 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Tunisia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 63rd and Tunisia ranks 65th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6122 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0188 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia
1970s 0.328 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3543 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0264 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia
1980s 0.1307 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1654 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0347 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia
1990s 0.161 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1331 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0279 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2000s 0.1379 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0967 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0412 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Ecuador
2010s 0.0787 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0864 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0078 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia
2020s 0.0843 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0919 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0076 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Ecuador or Tunisia?
Ecuador, at 0.0823 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.081 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Ecuador and Tunisia?
0.0013 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Ecuador ranks 63rd and Tunisia ranks 65th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.