Ecuador vs Fiji: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Ecuador
0.0823 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Fiji
0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Ecuador rank
63rd
Fiji rank
66th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Fiji
00.250.50.7511.2196019922025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0823 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Fiji, a difference of 0.0037 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Fiji ahead.

Ecuador ranks 63rd and Fiji ranks 66th of 194 countries.

Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Fiji Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5935 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.17 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5747 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Fiji
1970s 0.328 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4698 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1419 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Fiji
1980s 0.1307 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2485 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1177 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Fiji
1990s 0.161 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2008 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0398 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Fiji
2000s 0.1379 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1423 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0044 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Fiji
2010s 0.0787 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0788 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Fiji
2020s 0.0843 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0868 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0025 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Ecuador or Fiji?
Ecuador, at 0.0823 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Fiji as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Ecuador and Fiji?
0.0037 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Fiji?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Fiji rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Ecuador ranks 63rd and Fiji ranks 66th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Fiji: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/fiji/">Ecuador vs Fiji: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.