Early-demographic dividend vs Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Early-demographic dividend
0.089 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania
0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
19th
Tanzania rank
20th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Tanzania
00.511.5196119932025

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.089 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.1164 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 2.3 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 19th and Tanzania ranks 20th of 46 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2372 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6886 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4514 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2000s 0.1681 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4533 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2852 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2010s 0.1021 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2694 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1672 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania
2020s 0.0984 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2221 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1237 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Early-demographic dividend or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.089 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Early-demographic dividend and Tanzania?
0.1164 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Tanzania?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Tanzania rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 19th and Tanzania ranks 20th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/tanzania/">Early-demographic dividend vs Tanzania: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.