Congo vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Congo
0.06 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Guatemala
0.061 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Congo rank
82nd
Guatemala rank
79th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Guatemala
00.511.5196019922025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.061 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.06 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0.001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 82nd and Guatemala ranks 79th of 194 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9958 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9961 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1970s 0.4492 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6614 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2122 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1980s 0.1644 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3195 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1551 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
1990s 0.1602 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2638 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1036 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2000s 0.0954 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1763 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.081 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2010s 0.0508 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.104 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0533 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala
2020s 0.0609 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.074 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0131 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Congo or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.061 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.06 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Congo and Guatemala?
0.001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guatemala?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Congo and Guatemala rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Congo ranks 82nd and Guatemala ranks 79th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/guatemala/">Congo vs Guatemala: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.