Comoros vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Comoros
0.2153 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Comoros rank
18th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
20th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Comoros
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.60.8198020022025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0.2153 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0099 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Comoros ranks 18th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5155 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6886 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1732 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.4269 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4533 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0264 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.2853 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2694 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Comoros
2020s 0.2562 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2221 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0341 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Comoros or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Comoros, at 0.2153 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2054 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Comoros and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0099 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Comoros ranks 18th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/comoros/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/comoros/tanzania/">Comoros vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.