China vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

China
0.0703 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Thailand
0.0736 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
China rank
72nd
Thailand rank
70th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • China
  • Thailand
0123196019922025

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 0.0736 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0703 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0.0033 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Thailand ahead.

China ranks 72nd and Thailand ranks 70th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Thailand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.72 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.664 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Thailand
1970s 1.35 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.45 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0981 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Thailand
1980s 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6351 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4038 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China
1990s 0.6931 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2285 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4645 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China
2000s 0.2758 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1771 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0988 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP China
2010s 0.0884 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0884 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Thailand
2020s 0.0691 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0765 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0074 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), China or Thailand?
Thailand, at 0.0736 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0703 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between China and Thailand?
0.0033 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Thailand?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do China and Thailand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
China ranks 72nd and Thailand ranks 70th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/thailand/">China vs Thailand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.