Chile vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Chile
0.0327 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Mauritius
0.0356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Chile rank
118th
Mauritius rank
115th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
00.10.20.30.4196019922025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0327 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0.0029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 118th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0932 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3216 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2284 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1980s 0.0799 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2002 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1203 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
1990s 0.0595 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0806 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0211 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius
2000s 0.0538 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0485 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0053 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Chile
2010s 0.0349 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0289 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Chile
2020s 0.0331 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0348 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0017 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Chile or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.0356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0327 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Chile and Mauritius?
0.0029 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Chile ranks 118th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.