Central Europe and the Baltics vs Egypt: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.0151 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Egypt
0.1444 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
40th
Egypt rank
42nd

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Egypt
00.511.52196119932025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.1444 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0151 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.1293 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Egypt's figure about 9.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 40th and Egypt ranks 42nd of 46 groups.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0915 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.277 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1856 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Egypt
2000s 0.0505 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2586 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2081 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Egypt
2010s 0.0266 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1336 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1069 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Egypt
2020s 0.0192 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1205 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1014 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Central Europe and the Baltics or Egypt?
Egypt, at 0.1444 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0151 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Central Europe and the Baltics and Egypt?
0.1293 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Egypt?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Egypt rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 40th and Egypt ranks 42nd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Egypt: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/egypt-arab-rep/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Egypt: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.