Brazil vs Jamaica: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Brazil
0.0484 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Jamaica
0.0497 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Brazil rank
97th
Jamaica rank
94th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Brazil
  • Jamaica
00.20.40.6196019922025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 0.0497 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0484 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Brazil, a difference of 0.0013 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Jamaica ahead.

Brazil ranks 97th and Jamaica ranks 94th of 194 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4389 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.5243 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0854 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jamaica
1970s 0.2073 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3431 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1358 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jamaica
1980s 0.1164 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2286 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1122 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jamaica
1990s 0.0705 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1586 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.088 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jamaica
2000s 0.0666 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0711 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0046 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jamaica
2010s 0.036 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0605 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0245 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jamaica
2020s 0.0499 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.057 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0071 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Brazil or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 0.0497 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0484 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Brazil as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Brazil and Jamaica?
0.0013 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jamaica?
60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Brazil and Jamaica rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Brazil ranks 97th and Jamaica ranks 94th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Jamaica: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/brazil/jamaica/">Brazil vs Jamaica: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.