Botswana vs Finland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Botswana
0.0156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Finland
0.0165 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Botswana rank
150th
Finland rank
148th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Botswana
  • Finland
00.511.52196019922025

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0165 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Botswana, a difference of 0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 150th and Finland ranks 148th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Finland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Finland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4047 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1065 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2982 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Botswana
1980s 0.1146 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0637 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0509 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Botswana
1990s 0.0488 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0336 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0153 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Botswana
2000s 0.0279 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0228 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0051 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Botswana
2010s 0.0193 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0184 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Botswana
2020s 0.0163 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0179 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0017 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Botswana or Finland?
Finland, at 0.0165 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Botswana as of 2025.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Botswana and Finland?
0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Finland?
51 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2025.
How do Botswana and Finland rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Botswana ranks 150th and Finland ranks 148th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Finland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/botswana/finland/">Botswana vs Finland: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.