Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0321 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
New Zealand
0.0339 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
119th
New Zealand rank
116th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • New Zealand
0.050.10.150.2197720012025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0339 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0321 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0018 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 119th and New Zealand ranks 116th of 194 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina New Zealand Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0961 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0765 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0197 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.0557 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0405 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0152 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.0426 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0341 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0085 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Bosnia and Herzegovina or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.0339 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0321 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
0.0018 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Zealand rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 119th and New Zealand ranks 116th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bosnia-and-herzegovina/new-zealand/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs New Zealand: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.