Barbados vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)

Barbados
0.0122 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Netherlands
0.0113 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Barbados rank
156th
Netherlands rank
158th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) over time

  • Barbados
  • Netherlands
00.10.20.3196919972025

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0122 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0113 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 156th and Netherlands ranks 158th of 194 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Netherlands Difference Ahead
1970s 0.305 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0333 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2717 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
1980s 0.1109 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0365 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0743 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
1990s 0.0542 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0262 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0281 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
2000s 0.0296 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0185 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0111 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
2010s 0.0184 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0159 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0025 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Barbados
2020s 0.0166 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0143 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0023 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$), Barbados or Netherlands?
Barbados, at 0.0122 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0113 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Netherlands as of 2024.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$) between Barbados and Netherlands?
0.0009 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Netherlands?
50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Netherlands rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 us$)?
Barbados ranks 156th and Netherlands ranks 158th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/netherlands/">Barbados vs Netherlands: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 10,602 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.